Philosophical notes and meditations.

Corp.Welfare=Eminent Domain & Redevelopment, Philosophy, Meditations, Poetry, Short Stories, Novella

Philosophical notes and meditations.

"Dare to inquire and understand unexplored assumptions that govern your life."

This section of the website offers philosophical insights. The author's interest is to find out why the world is encumbered with conflict. Ilusion interpets power, money, and an image of a "Self" insulated with ideas, concepts, and forms. We live life in fleeting moments repeating patterns avoiding awakening our intelligence.

***

Our brain is driven:

Our brain is conditioned by our parents, society, and culture. We are driven to act on impulses from boundaries' self imposed, society, and inherited. A brain conditioned is repetitive and in a constant pattern of ego centered activity. The repetition of the ego centered activity finds’ security in those boundaries; therefore, the mind is narrow and find it difficult to empty and liberate boundaries of the self, religion, political, social, and cultural, etc. The mind need security; however, our disorder is from false security because the brain is conditioned to think and behave in a conditioned state. To live freer in the mind, a quality of passion and energy is essential to find out the pattern of the ego centered activity. To find the pattern of the ego centered activity is the exploration of the nature of humanity and the person's relationship to society, and new insight on human thought, death, intelligence, love, cosmic order, and the problem of the fragment mind. To live freer in the mind, of course, takes energy to meditate and explore our existence and condition. Living free in the mind is an awakening of intelligence and the fruit of that intelligence are compassion and love, a natural condition. One must have a passion for inquiry and to explore one's condition requires a radical psychological revolution, an insight with one's whole heart, mind, and being. As you can see, the root of all disorder is psychological; however, it is possible through insight the mind can renew itself, healing the damage caused by wrong function - our psychological condition. This requires going from one's narrow and particular interest toward the general, and ultimately moving still deeper into that purity of compassion, love, and intelligence that originate in the ground beyond thought, beyond time, even beyond emptiness.

***

Man took a wrong turn:

Five thousand years ago man took a wrong turn when he learned that he can plunder and take slaves. After that, his main purpose of existence was just to exploit and plunder. Instead of being constructive, and discovering new techniques and tools and so on, men at a certain time found it easier to plunder his neighbors and use Slaves to exploit. The nature of Eminent Domain, Redevelopment, and Revitalization using condemnation as a tool is the inherited disposition of our ancestors. We are conditioned to be aggressive and strengthen our ego not being aware how destructive that may be.

Challenging the theory of Darwin:

The theory of the fittest is true in one respect, and untrue to say the Mind evolved in Time. Physically, it seems there has been a process of evolution, and that this has increased the capacity of the brain to do certain things. For example, the advances in medicine, science, and technology required a larger brain. The part which the author views incorrect by the fittest theory is that psychologically we have taken a turn to a wrong direction and no fault of our own we have strengthened and focus the greatest energy in exploitation and plundering. It has become our habit to misuse our mind in a direction of conflict, and we resist and find it difficult to find out how and why we took a wrong turn.

***

Integration of Heart and Mind:

Modern education, in developing the intellect, offers more and more theories and facts without bringing about the understanding of the total process of human existence. We are highly intellectual; we have developed cunning minds, and are caught up in explanations, but intelligence is not; and for the understanding of the total process of existence, there must be an integration of the mind and heart in action. It is clear, then, that merely to cultivate the intellect, which is to develop capacity or knowledge, does not result in intelligence. There is distinction between intellect and intelligence. Intellect is thought functioning independently of emotion, whereas, intelligence is the capacity to feel as well as to Reason and until we approach life with intelligence, instead of intellect alone, or with emotion alone, no political or educational system in the world can save us from the toils of chaos and destruction.

The joint power authority lacked the "intelligence" to integrate emotion and reason essential for insight in determining the realities of the North Lake project. Most likely, if the City of San Bernardino looked at the project with "intelligence" the project would have taken a different turn. We have separated intellect from feeling, and developed intellect at the expense of feeling.

We are trained to be intellectual, our education cultivates the intellect to be sharp, cunning, acquisitive, and so it plays the most important role in our life. Intelligence is much greater than the intellect, for it is the integration of reason and love. There can be intelligence only when there is self knowledge, the deep understanding of the total process of oneself.

***

Awareness May Burn Away the Problems.

All thinking obviously is conditioned; there is no such thing as free thinking. Thinking can never be free, but it is the outcome of our conditioning, of our background, of our culture, of our social, economic, and political background, etc. The very books we read and the very practices we do are all established in the background, and any thinking must be a result of that background. So if we can be aware, and we can go presently into what it signifies, what it means, to be aware perhaps we will be able to un condition the mind without the process of will, without the determination to un condition the mind. Because the moment you determine, there is an entity who wishes, and an entity who says, "I need to un condition my mind." That entity itself is the outcome of our desire to achieve a certain result, so a conflict is already there. So, is it possible to be aware of our conditioning, just to be aware? In which there is no conflict at all. That very awareness, if allowed, may perhaps burn away the problems.

***

Intellect corrupts feeling.

You know, there is the intellect, and there is pure feeling - the pure feeling of loving something, of having great generous emotions. The intellect reasons, calculates, weigh, and balance. It asks, "Is it important? Will it give me benefit?" On the other hand, there is pure feeling - the extraordinary feeling for the sky, for your neighbor, for your wife or husband, for your child, for the world, for the beauty of a tree, flower, and so on. When pure feeling is corrupted by the intellect, there is mediocrity. That is what most of us are doing. Our lives are mediocre because we are always calculating, asking ourselves whether it is worthwhile, what profit we will get, not only in the world of money, but also in the so-called spiritual world - "If I do this, will I get that."

***

The many interpretations of Religion:

Religion has many interpreters, interpretations, and sacred canopies indoctrinated by religious authority. One must be outside the sacred canopy for "Truth" because "Truth" is free from dogma, rituals, organized thought, and Time. A religious mind is contrary to what we have been taught to believe in and one must have passion and energy to study the sacred canopies of religion. Our mind must be freer in order to be an outsider and see the nature of religion in action. Insight is essential for "Truth" to approach because insight does not have a cause; insight does not demand, want, or expect anything. Insight is a " flash" of illumination which shed light to be freer from our psychological condition. in this case, under the sacred canopy of religion. If one is indoctrinated, it is impossible for "Insight" to occur because the mind is conditioned. Only when we step outside the sacred canopy we can capture a moment of "Insight" to illuminate as "Truth" finds a chance to pierce the thickness of the "Self."

***

A distorted view of Intimacy.

Our culture abuses the nature of Sex that all too often Sex is used as an escape to resolve the "Self" for a brief time. Therefore, I noted Sex as an escape from the "Self"; however, the expression of Sex is meaningful when the couple has the Emotion of true intimacy and awareness of the "Self" harmonized with Reason.

Sex as an expression or the abnegation of the Self?

Sex is a problem because it would seem in that act there is complete absence of the Self. In that moment you are happy, because there is the cessation of Self-consciousness, of "me." Desiring more of it -- more of the abnegation of the Self in which there is complete happiness, without the past or the future --demanding complete happiness through full fusion, integration, naturally it becomes all important. Sex is something which gives you unadulterated joy, complete Self-forgetfulness, I want more and more of it. Now, why do I want more of it? Because, everywhere else I am in conflict, everywhere else, at all the different levels of existence, there is the strengthening of the Self. Economically, politically, socially, and religiously, there is this constant thickening of the Self -Conscious which is conflict. After all, you are Self consciously only where there is conflict. Self consciousness is in it’s very nature is the result of conflict. So, the problem is not Sex, surely, but how to be free from the Self. You have tasted that state of Being in which the Self is not, If only for a few seconds. So, there is the constant longing for more of that "Self Free State."

***

Insight is causeless and is not bound to Time.

Love and Insight has no cause; however, hate and the material process has a cause. As insight is causeless, it has a definite effect which has a cause. Love is without cause and hate has a cause; therefore, the two cannot coexist. Love and insight are not identical because insight occurs in a flash. The mind is conditioned to form a particular pattern. Insight alters the pattern, in the sense, I argue, reason, use logic. etc. Insight operates as a flash and breaks the pattern or lessen the thickness of the "Self." It would be more rational and make logic more possible, because you have been confused before the flash. So, what than is the nature of insight since insight has no cause and is without Time because cause implies Time. The material process is set in the pattern and insight operates to break the pattern. The pattern is the content of our self imposed, religious, political, social, cultural, and personal boundaries. The pattern is the content of our consciousness which is the material process of thought. This flash of insight enlightens the whole field of a pattern in order for the mind to be freer. Now, we know darkness and light cannot coexist for obvious reasons, but the very existence of light is to change the process of darkness. Than what contributes this light and flash that shed ignorance in the material process which has brought about confusion, and all the mess in the world? Insight, a pure energy, (light) independent from the material process can act on the material process because the material process is the content of thought, the very nature of the pattern. This flash is the light and pure energy which is without cause, without time, and operates as long as the"Self" is not present. This pure energy dispels the very center of ignorance or darkness. Since this pure energy (light) dispels the very center of ignorance (darkness)(freer from the pattern) there is a mutation in the brain. By dispelling darkness (ignorance) in the brain, insight allows the brain to function in a new way.

***

The author's interpretation pertaining to "Thought" is the acquisition of psychological knowledge acquired and inherited. Knowledge is essential to acquire skills such as language, reading, and thinking; however, knowledge in reference to "Thought" used is "psychological," a defense mechanism in order to avoid or distant Reality.

If you observe, you will see how we use people, or groups, or religion to escape, We seek comfort in that relationship. Such a search for comfort in relationship brings certain experiences and to those experiences we cling. To escape from ourselves, psychological knowledge becomes extraordinarily important, but psychological knowledge is obviously not the way to Reality. The Mind must be completely empty and still for Reality to come into being; therefore, it is essential, for reality to come into being, to set aside the innumerable escapes one has established, in which one is caught up. A mind rattling around with knowledge, addicted to ideas and beliefs, is incapable of receiving that which is.

Pure Energy

Pure Energy has no cause; therefore, insight is independent of the material process known as thought, the pattern, our psychological condition imposed and inherited. Thought (psychologically) has been operating in ignorance, creating its own ignorance. Insight is like a flash and has the ability to break down the darkness of ignorance. When insight clears the darkness does the mind function, differently? Yes, man and woman will function rationally, and with perception rather than by rules and reason. Reason is identified with certain rules of logic which would be mechanical. But there can be Reason as a form of Perception of Order. It is the flash of light which makes perception possible. So Insight is Pure Perception, and from that Perception there is Action, which then sustained by Rationality and the Rationality is Perception of Order. The author notes, there is Insight, Perception, and Order; however, Order is not mechanical because it is not based on Logic. This order is not based on rules. Insight is the pure energy which has an extraordinary effect on the material process because the material process is dependent on that process but Insight is not dependent on that process but independent because of it's origin.

The Clarification of Thought.

Thought is essential, for example, in the field of knowledge as learning a new language or read a book. In this field of knowledge "thought" has a proper place. The problem of "thought" is in the psychological field of "Self" and the formation of boundaries which inhibits the movement of a freer "Self." Psychological knowledge becomes a hindrance for freeing the pattern. Insight; however, has the ability to lessen the pattern of our condition as human beings. Surely, to be freer of social, political, religious, and personal boundaries is a life of intelligence and order.

The clarification of "Original Thought. Challenging the goal of Psychology.

"Original Thought is "Intelligence" viewed by the author. In our lives we are bombarded by activities which nullify "Original Thought." (Intelligence) Only, when we have a few moments to spare, we glance and "Original Thought" may approach. In Society "Thought" is considered the rule opposed to "Original Thought"; however, I find Society's interpretation partially correct because "Thought" is derived from "Original Thought." If this is true than "Original Thought" is pure energy and "Thought" is a source from pure energy. Because of psychological conditioning "Thought" has become estranged from "Original Thought." The need for false security created a "Self" packed with layers of boundaries.

The goal of psychology is to work with "Thought" and rarely question the impact of false security which disharmonies "Thought" and "Original Thought." The tool in psychology is not to free the movements of false security but to shift one movement of false security for another. In essence, the function of psychology in general is to shift the pattern in the content of consciousness opposed to dissolving the pattern and be free from conflict harmonizing "Thought" and "Original Thought." Thought is essential for practical purposes; however, psychologically "Thought" is a hindrance because of conflict of interest with "Original Thought."

Psychologically we have created boundaries, that is, social, religious, political, cultural, personal, and inherited which cause conflict. We live in a world dominated by "Thought"; therefore, "Original Thought" in society is considered reserved for a few bright minds. The author find that untrue because the human mind, unless diseased, is inherently awakened with "Original Thought" if "Thought" is understood and harmonized with "Original Thought."

Surely, to be freer from your psychological condition is a source of peace and joy.

****

Thought, and Intelligence have a common source of one energy; why did it divide?What is the relation of thought and intelligence?

The origin of the word "intelligence" means "to read between." So, it seems to me that "thought" is like the information in a book and that "intelligence" has to read it, the meaning of it.

Intelligence is very different from what people have in mind when they measure intelligence. The author view intelligence independent from thought but have a common source, that is from one energy. Thought is the physical and chemical process which is mechanical, repetitive, measurable, comparative, and dependent. The brain is the content of consciousness, patterns, and conditioning which is inherited, self imposed, or indoctrinated by culture and society. The author clarifies the distinction between brain and mind to point out the nature of "thought" and "intelligence." The author point out that matter, thought, and intelligence have a common source, derived from one energy; why did it divide? This division is "thought" as our"brain and "intelligence" as the "mind."

The author uses the word brain and mind to distinguish the negative and positive from one instrument. For example, you can measure an electric current by the swing of the needle in the instrument, or you can use the same instrument in what is called the Wheatstone bridge, where the reading you look for is null reading; a null reading indicates harmony, balances of the two sides of the whole system as is being. So, if you are using the instrument negatively, then the non movement of the instrument is the sign it is working right. This example is to point out the brain may have use "thought" positively to make an image of the world. This image is the content of your consciousness, patterns, and boundaries. Since the image is from "thought" and derived from the division of Intelligence or "pure energy" than Intelligence Existed before Thought and is without Time, Condition, and Free from Security. The idea of security does not exist in Intelligence because Intelligence itself is Secure.The general view is that time is the essence of existence. It is very hard to give up such view because it is intense conditioning. It is stronger even than the conditioning of the observer and the observed. Intelligence is out of time and therefore not related to thought, which is the movement of time. Intelligence; however, operates on the quietness of the brain and change the pattern of unintelligent thought. Thought is necessary and this thought point obviously toward Matter. Thought is essential; however, thought must have security and seek security in all its movement. Though, matter, and intelligence have a common source otherwise there could be no harmony. Thought and the intellect dominate the world; therefore, intelligence has very little place here. When one thing dominates, the other must be subservient. Thought must have security and it is seeking security in all its movement. But intelligence is not seeking security. It has no security. The idea of security does not exist in intelligence. Intelligence itself is secure, not, "it seeks security."

Thought began and moved on its own accord; got out of hand and ceased to allow itself to be orderly, ordered in general by intelligence or at least to stay in harmony with intelligence. Thought’s main interest is seeking false security of pleasure, comfort, and isolating the "Self" forming cultural, social, religious, political, and personal boundaries. Thought got out of hand and moved on its own accord separately from Intelligence. Now security, physical security is necessary and therefore physical existence; however, pleasure and division became tremendously important.

If you go back to the animal, then there is instinctive response toward pleasure and toward security; that would be right. But now thought comes in, it can dazzle the instinct and produce all sorts of glamour, more pleasure, more security. And instincts are not intelligent enough to deal with the complexity of thought. Therefore, thought went wrong, because it excited the instincts. So, thought really created a world of illusion, confusion, and put away intelligence. Surely, that has made the brain very chaotic and noisy. Intelligence is the silence of the brain; therefore, the noisy brain is not intelligent. Hopefully, the author explained the origin of how thought moved on its own accord seeking more illusion of security. Intelligence obviously understands the activity of thought and operates on thought when the brain is quiet. For example, thought creates an insolation of a certain condition and the pattern of that condition is nationalism as a means of security. The inquiry of nationalism is division, war, conflict, and all the rest of it. The inquirer sees the falseness of what is going on. When thought is free from all, this falseness, it is different. Then it begins to be a parallel to intelligence. What is interesting is thought is never actually controlled or dominated by Intelligence, thought always moves on its own will. But in the light of intelligence, when the falseness is seen, then thought moves parallel or in harmony with intelligence.

But there is never anything that forces thought to do anything. That would suggest intelligence and thought has this common origin or substance, and they are two ways of calling attention to a greater whole.

One can see how political, religiously, psychologically, thought has created a world of tremendous contradiction, and fragmentation. Intelligence tries to bring order in this confusion. It is not the intellect, which sees the falseness of all this. You see, one can be terribly intelligent although one is chaotic and the self is cloaked and insulated. The falseness is seen through "insight" who sees the tremendous contradiction operating in the brain which is psychologically conditioned in Time.

Surely, Thought and Intelligence are like two streams moving in different directions. Thought, Matter, the Mechanical, is Energy. Thought is conditioned, confused, polluted, dividing itself, fragmenting itself. Thought is multiple and intelligence is not. It is not polluted. It cannot divide itself as "my intelligence" and "your intelligence." It is intelligence, and it is not divisible. Now it has sprung from a source of energy which has divided itself. Now, why has it divided itself? The author find physical reasons and to maintain physical existence.

So, a part of intelligence has been changed in such way as to help to maintain physical existence. Thought was born and was necessary for survival. That is all. In survival this in its totality, in its wholeness has been denied, or put aside. The author find it essential to touch that source in which division does not exist and because it has touched this source, which has no divisions it can operate without the sense of division to live freer in the brain and awaken the intelligence of the Mind.

***

Death: "The House of Death is for the Living."

Is it possible for the mind to cease to think in terms of its own continuity that the unknowable come into being?

We all know that death does exist, especially the older people, and also the young who observe it. The young say, "Wait till it comes and I deal with it." And the old, who are nearer death, have recourse to various forms of consolation.

Consciously or unconsciously death is in our mind because we know that we are going to die. We have theories about death. Some of us believe in God. Some believe in resurrection, rebirth, or in karma and reincarnation. Some say that there is a heaven, or will be reborn on earth, or in another world or worlds. Some will rationalize death, saying death is inevitable, it happens to everybody. Others are too occupied with daily worries, anxieties, jealousies, envy, with competition and wealth, to think about death at all. The fact remains, death is in our mind, consciously or unconsciously. It is there!

Is it possible to be free of our beliefs, the rationalities or the indifference we have cultivated toward Death? Can we be free from our conditioning which has been cultivated toward Death? Can we be free of all that now? Because what is important is to enter the House of Death while Living, while fully conscious, active, in health, and not wait for the coming of death, which may carry you off instantaneously through an accident, or through a disease that slowly makes you unconscious. When Death comes it must be an extraordinary moment that is as vital as Living.

Is it possible to enter the House of Death while Living? That is important opposed to whether there is a heaven, reincarnation, rebirth, or perhaps another world where you will be reborn, which is all so immature, infantile, and primitive. A man or woman who lives never asks what is living and has no theories about living. It is only the half alive who talk about the purpose of life.

Is it possible while living, conscious, active, with all our capacities whatever they are, know what death is? And is Death then different from Living? To most of us, living is a continuation of that which we think is permanent. All the things in which we have a vested interest economically and spiritually, the virtues we have cultivated, the things that we have acquired emotionally; all of that we want to continue. And the moment we call death is a moment of the unknown. Therefore, we are frightened, so we try to find a consolation, some kind of comfort; we want to know if there is life after death, and a dozen other things. Those are all irrelevant problems, they are problems for the lazy, for those who do not want to find out what Death is while Living.

What is Death? Surely, it is the complete cessation of everything we have known. If it is not the cessation of everything we have known, it is not death. If we know death already then we have nothing to be frightened of. But do we know Death? That is, can we while living put an end to this everlasting struggle to find in the impermanent something which will continue? Can we know the unknowable, that state we call Death, while Living?

Can we put aside all the descriptions of what happens after Death we have read in books, or our unconscious desire for comfort dictates, and taste a state which must be extraordinary - now? If one experience that state now, then Living and Dying are the same.

Is it possible for those who have a vast education, knowledge, who have innumerable experiences, struggles, loves, hates, can that "I" come to an end? "I" am the recorded memory of all that, and can that "I" come to an end? Without being brought to an end by an accident, by a disease, can that End? Only than you will find you will no longer ask foolish questions about death, rebirth, reincarnation, heaven, or other interpretation offered by religion.

The beauty of death is we will know the answer for ourselves because which is unknowable will have come into being. Then we will put asides the whole rigmarole of death interpreted by religion - and the many fears - the fear of living and fear of dying, the fear of growing old, the fear of loneliness and dependency - will all have come to an end. It is only when the mind ceases to think in terms of its own continuity the unknowable are known.

"Only when we enter Daily the House of Death while Living we find Reality as our true source of security and happiness." Deanna

****

Violence:

"To see violence as it is - as a fundamental issue in human relationship is contrary to explaining the causes of violence." Deanna

In every part of the world there are revolts and revolutions in order to change the social structure. Obviously, the structure has to be changed; is it possible to change it without violence? Violence begets violence. Through revolt one part can assume the power of government, and having achieved this, it will maintain itself in power through violence.

The major cause of violence is each one of us is inwardly, psychologically, seeking security. In each one of us the urge for psychological security - that inward sense of being safe - projects the demand, the outward demand, for security. Inwardly, each one of us wants to be secure, sure, certain. That is why we have all these laws; in order to be secure in our relationship. If the relationship is attacked we become violent, which is the psychological demand, the inward demand, to be certain of our relationship to everything. But there is no such thing as certainty, security, in any relationship. Inwardly, psychologically, we should like to be secure, but there is no such thing as permanent security. Because the mind needs security through attachments and once the attachment is threatened violence set in. To be freer from violence is to be freer from attachments. After all, the only security that exists is no security. The wisdom of insecurity is to be freer from violence.

****

"Surely, Tools of the Mind are Worthy and Far more Reaching than Isolation to Rehabilitate a Prisoner." Deana

The Prison System:

"The prisoner is freer than those holding the violator captive. The violator is bound to a cell and those who hold him captive is free from the cell, but as the prisoner is equal a slave bound to a failed system" Deanna

The prison system has failed and unless we find alternatives in resolving this significant problem the system will fall in despair. How can we resolve such a problem? The warden in charge, correctional officers, and all others involved attempts to rehabilitate the prisoner, who is violent, is disturbed because the prisoner rebels and becomes more violent. So, what can we do to change that? One must understand the men who hold the prisoners’ captive are also captive of a flawed system or a system who find prison profitable. There is no rehabilitation in a prison. The condition to control, manipulate, and mold the prisoner in an image adds to the violence. So, the whole movement between the two is like a circus and the warden being the ringmaster securing a profitable enterprise. Than how can one rehabilitate? The brain after all has accumulated patterns of behavior that is violent. If this is the case, the mind can negate those patterns which cause violence. The only rehabilitation is healing the violater's own brain and meditation is the tool which has the ability to approach the deep recesses of the mind and free the attachment of the need to be angry and violent.

Now, one cannot assume if a prisoner meditates he will be become non violent. No, the need to remain attached to his anger will consequently be diminished and negate together if his inquiry and observation are passionate. The brain has been damaged with violence, anger, and unusual stress; however, in meditation the brain will heal itself and repair the damage as much as possible. Unless the brain is diseased nature will find a way to heal the part of the brain afflicted.

All other hypotheses are temporary because we failed to use the mind to correct what has been caused by the brain through patterns of conditioning. That is the disorder! It is that simple because the root of all disorder is psychological. Meditating and being in touch with that source that caused the violence is the answer.

The author wonders if the prison system is capable to handle such psychological transformation of simplicity as Meditation. Unless such psychological revolution as mindful meditation takes place in and outside the cell the prison system will not be able to resolve or significantly reduce this problem. The answer to mitigate significant problems is to mitigate the layers of conditioning in the mind by observing the "what is" in the content consciousness. To conclude, Meditation is independent of culture, gender, religion, social, and political beliefs.

The author recommends for each inmate to meditate two hours per day sitting quietly observing his or her thoughts understanding the observer is the observed. Have the meditator progress to four hours per day until the meditator can sit quietly for six hours. The investment is simple: a sitting mat for each inmate and install meditative music.

The author recommends education: GED, High School, and Advanced College Degrees. The advanced degrees, however, must be earned through an accredited university. Investing in education is prudent and offers a possibility for real change. Television of educational material must be encouraged and have each inmate learn chess. Chess and cross word puzzles are good for the brain plus a good library and music of interest.

The prison system have perfected skill of isolation to the best. Off course, isolation is the worst form of rehabilitation. Isolation equals violence. Unless the prison system change the tax payers shall have no other alternative but to built more prisons. The motive of the State must not be in profit but investing in the mind of the inmate to resolve its over populated prisons.

Once the meditator achieves meditating for two hours the prison system can add dance. Dancing to music is good because dancing is free from interpretation, conflict, racial, and social boundaries. Dancing is neutral and excellent for the organism.
************************

The Brain and Mind

The Brain and Mind are from one source of energy; however, the Brain is the source that lives within the boundaries of the psychological conditioned state. The Mind is the source not bound by the psychological conditioned state of the Brain. Meditation is the way to awaken the intelligence of the conditioned state and negate the patterns of the condition and heal the damaged brain. The author is using Brain and Mind as a language to point out the conditioned state in the Organism.
****

More on the origin of aggression.

Surely, we have inherited our aggression from our animal nature but as social human animals we are wired to use alternatives to fend off aggression in order to survive as a Group. The author observes that aggression is programmed at birth and find aggression which plays a role at a very early age. If you watch young children (up to five yrs) you can observe a display of physical violence. Perhaps, as adults we do not see it as violence but setting that aside why are children aggressive at a real early age? I believe because we have been programmed to attack; however, as the child develops, the aggression is minimized and other alternatives to fend off aggression is learned. I believe that our investment in Society is finding tools when the child is very young and use tools to direct aggression in a positive manner. In our society we missed the mark. We find the stage of adolescence troublesome; however, if we used tools of directing aggression at an early age (birth - 5 yrs) we would minimize problems of violence at adolescence and adulthood. Now, aggression has two possibilities. One, you step on the brakes and Second, you drive full speed. Most of us fall under the first possibility in order to survive as a group and those who go for full speed will find them isolated and in trouble.

To summarize:

We are wired to fend off aggression when we realize in order to survive as a group the individual find cooperation a better bet. To lessen violence the aggression must be recognized at a very young age and finding tools to redirect aggression is a worthy investment for the future of the individual and the group.

Veneer Theory or Morality is the Extension of the Social Instinct?

"We have biologically inherited traits of empathy and reciprocity. These traits are wired in our Brains and are independent of traits passed by genes or learned from the environment. These traits are essential for the group's survival and since empathy and reciprocity are moral traits the human being is inherently moral. Of course, biologically we have equally inherited behaviors to fend off those who aggress against us, however, empathy and reciprocity are behaviors of the Brain. The nurturing of those behaviors is essential to assure the survival of a group, but nevertheless these traits are biological wired in the Brain. What has this to do with Eminent Domain? The Law of Eminent Domain is a Bad Law because the taking against the will violates traits of empathy and reciprocity. These traits are innate biological and therefore the outcome of Eminent Domain cause injury toward the individual and the group. A law that violates empathy and reciprocity is a Bad Law because the law is contrary to the natural function of the Brain." Deanna

****

The argument: If the state of nature is only instinctual and not moral how can we explain the innate traits of empathy, reciprocity, and social negotiation shared by our ancestors?

The human organism has these traits inherited from our ancestors; therefore, the state of nature must be moral and morality is essential to survive as a group? If traits of empathy, reciprocity, and social negotiation are innate than we may conclude evolved from our ancestors that Man's state of nature is Instinctual Moral.

What is your point of view pertaining to SBMVWD and City of San Bernardino regarding the State of Nature and Eminent Domain?
Discern the Constitution and Declaration of Independence State of Nature with SBMVWD and the City of San Bernardino North Lake Reservoir project?

The State of Nature

Argument: Is the state of nature instinctual, moral, or both?
The psychological of Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) are very pessimistic. Every living organism obeys laws of individual survival; therefore, all human acts are motivated by self interest and the quest for power. According to Hobbes, altruism not just a bad idea, it is impossible. Far from being immoral and egoism is the only show in town.

Hobbes is best known for his political philosophy, which is influence by his egoistic theory of motivation. He recognized the state as an artificial monster (the Leviathan) which restricts what little freedom there is in nature and flaunts its power over the individual, but Hobbes justified the existence of the political state by contrasting it with the notorious state of nature dominated by scarcity and fear, where every man is the enemy to every man, and life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. In the state of nature there are no law, no morality, no property, and only one natural right - the right to protect oneself using any means disposal, including violence and slaughter. Hobbes famous social contract is a third party is needed to protect each other from harm. The solution is the two parties agreed to give a third party all their rights. In exchange, the third party promises to use his or her absolute power to guarantee that the first two parties honor their agreement with each other. The irony of a Hobbes social contract is there is nothing to prevent the third party from abusing his or her power because his or her innate egoistic nature and innate lust for power, and it are almost inevitable that he or she would do so. According to Hobbes the State, even with its necessity abuse of power, was better than the alterative the anarchy in the state of nature.

The state of nature according to John Locke (1634-1704) was very different indeed from what Hobbes meant by it. Far from being in which there is no justice nor injustice, no right, nor wrong, nor mine or yours. Locke's state of nature is a moral state - the state into which we are all born as humans, where we are all bestowed with certain God given, natural rights, the right to life, health, liberty, and possessions. Recall that for Hobbes, there was only one natural right, the right to try to preserve one's life. Hobbes seems to have believed a kind of instinct for survival authorized that right. Locke's theory contains several natural rights, all of which are moral rather than instinctual, and they derive their authority from God. Hobbes was particularly insistent there was no such as a natural right to property since in nature there is no property, only possession. Locke, to the contrary, claimed we have a natural right to whatever part of nature we have mixed our labor with. So, if you till the soil, or cut down a tree and make a house from it, then this garden and that house are mine and will be my childrens when they inherit them from me. Locke, did put qualifications on this natural right to property opposed to Thomas Hobbes who insist there was no such thing as a natural right to property, since in nature there is no property, only possession. It is noteworthy that Locke's theory pre supposes a state of abundance in nature, while Hobbes presupposes a state of scarcity. According to Locke, individual political states are to be evaluated in terms of how well they protect the natural rights of the individuals living in those states.A good state is one which guarantees and maximizes those rights; a bad state is one which does not guarantee them; an EVIL state is one which it assaults the natural rights,
Locke's version of the social contract is all citizens consent to be ruled by a government elected by a majority for just as long as government protects the natural rights. But a TYRANNICAL government is illegitimate and ought to be revolted against.

Note that, unlike Hobbes, Locke is able to distinguish between legitimate and an illegitimate government, and provides a theory of justifiable revolution. It is clear the Founding Fathers used Locke's theory to Justify the American revolution, and they incorporated his ideas into our Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

Meditations by Deanna.

Celebration with the Cosmos.

Today, my soul and I danced on the mountain to disperse the dust and dirt of the earth. Arriving on the mountain, the rising Sun fitful in splendor in Burnt Orange array stood above me. A small reddish breasted Robin on its course, was singing, calling and saying:

"I have news for you from the Cosmos, the lovely Cosmos who created you and I."

I said: "What news do you have for me today from the Cosmos?"

Singing, dancing, and joyfully flirting with the winds the Robin said:"Wisdom is not in words but in the meaning within words.

Wisdom is not in the acquisition of psychological knowledge but he who diligently negate the patterns of such knowledge is knowledge.

Greatness is not in exalted position but he who refuses exaltation is Great and his Gifts bestowed from the Cosmos shall be exalted.

Greatness is experiencing the present, ignoring the future, and forgetting the past.

A soul Freer from prisons and chains is innocent, contented, and happy.

Truth is in the heart and beauty is a light in the heart

O Truth, O Beauty, you and I are created from the Cosmos. Once you realize this Truth than no longer are you a Self,

The walls have fallen,

And the Chains have broken,

Your Soul is Freer".

The Robin left and my heart

Poured out my song on the mountain,

I open my bosom in this open space,

With the wind spreading my arms for adornment,

Dancing, I found my bliss on the mountain celebrating with the Cosmos who created me. From a simple Star I was evolved and here I am celebrating my birth, my origin on the Mountain. How perfect you are Mountain, and how majestic. You are the lost consort of my soul, and the other better half, O Mountain, glory of beauty, grace, and elegance. There is no other desire but to return as freer Energy purged from the vanities under the Sun.

That is what the Robin whispered to me upon the mountain and being thankful I said: "O' Robin sing, for the secret of eternity is in song and dance, imagine created from a Simple Star, how lovely the Cosmos is".

***

Meditation pertaining to Love for couples in Love

Wisdom of Kama Sutra

In the still of the night, my love and I walked to the Sea to wash our bodies in its water. After cleansing each other’s bodies we arrived at the Sea Shore preparing for Love. We search for a private place and meditated under a cool moon sky lit with stars. As our bodies touch the desert sand for Love, we saw a brilliant Star and heard a voice from the Sea calling: "I am the Spirit of Kama Sutra and I am the Wise Sage that offers wisdom in the art of making Love. We look in silence and said: "Wise Sage, teach us the wisdom of making Love because we only know Love what the World has taught us."

We longed for such Wisdom and in Silence we wait in humility until the Great Sage spoke:"Kama Sutra is an ancient art of making love. The art of Love is like a mystical dance, a continuous flow of a beautiful embrace. The mind is the most powerful sexual organ. As an artist, should always be patient and creative in its play. The wise know that physical pleasure is not the sole end of love making. It is like music, stirring the emotions, quickening the senses, dissolving thought into rhythm, until only rhythm exists. Kama Sutra is all energies in harmony and mutual recognition of two liberties – giving and receiving pleasure and respect. Kama Sutra is beyond the Ego, where Love is not an object but love as a revelation of the Self by the gift of Self."

Guided by the brilliant star the Wise Sage returned to the Sea. In that moment our Love became a source of Life as sacred and lovely. Thus, spoke Kama Sutra embracing infinity in the Art of Making Love.

*****

A philosophical note:
Distorted Perception of Reason

In Thomas Hobbes system reason delivers man and woman out of nature, and guides him and her toward a life of peace and security. Hobbes tells us that man has three "principal causes of a quarrel" in the state of nature. These are competition (for gain), diffidence (for safety) and glory (reputation). These laws of nature competition, diffidence, and glory provide the basis for a social contract and thus open the way for civil society.Society and society’s social contract is arranged on a Hobbes deterministic point of view. A Society where people are enemies and others are our competition; therefore, we must protect ourselves from them. Thus, people are basically "bad" and civilization attempts to domesticate them for which they pay a heavy price. Because of this reductionist conclusion, the individual is divided into "parts" opposed to an individual indivisible.Another point of view is holistic and that is the organicism is a unity and all "parts" (memory, emotions, and behavior) are in the service of the whole individual. The main mistake in Hobbes’s philosophy is the concept that two human beings can never meet in the forest because on must think; the other person is the enemy. Could it be these attitudes are based on reductionistic thinking and partially correct? Correct because that person could be an enemy, a fellow human being, collaborator, and cooperator in life. To point out, the reductionist view is fragmented; therefore, partially correct. The holistic point of view is correct because the organism instinctively perceives whole patterns and not bits and pieces. Because in perception, the "other person" is seen as an enemy, fellow human being, collaborator, and cooperator in life. Whole patterns have characteristics which cannot be gleaned by analyzing parts.Since the organism instinctively perceives whole patterns, the organism has the characteristics to perceive the enemy, fellow’s human being, collaborator, and cooperator simultaneously. Because an organism has the capacity for accurate perception when its use is a native ability of immediate experience, the concept of reductionistic thinking is then questionable. Western thinking is reductionistic and fundamentally "incorrect" opposed too holistically. We must redefine Hobbes’s philosophy of Reason and reexamine society and society’s social contract. From the evidence above reductionistic is "incorrect," and therefore, hopes or positive changes remain fruitless. The error of society and society’s social contract is a distorted perception of Reason, a product of reductionist thinking. The way for society to grow is to study the nature of reductionistic thinking, society and society institutions of education, politics, and religion remains unchanged, fruitless, and psychologically primitive.

***

Meditations

The Wisdom of Life and Death.

All religions offer us some promise of reward or punishment. The Asiatic outlook for rebirth and the Western idea of resurrection and rebirth in heaven offers both. The ancient Egyptians also prepared for death and filled their tombs with material riches. These theories, suppositions, and non fact is what religions offer reinforced by religious authorities. More of the importance is the fact that we are finite and have some limited amounts of time. Thus, the complete acceptance of death without fear, denial, or morbidity is the gateway to a richer life. Death and Life interact dynamically and meditation on death will serve to encourage us to redouble our efforts to a meaning life. A mind that is discontent can jump into reality; not a mind that is content; not a mind that is respectable, hedged about by belief. The greater purpose we find in our lives, the less we fear death. Then we do not need theories, supposition, and non facts. All these are escapes of responsibilities finding a purpose in life and death. What is true is revealed only through doubts, through questioning the many illusions, traditional values and ideals. Thus death is to live completely and there must be a dying to everything of yesterday; otherwise you live mechanically, and a mechanical mind can be never known what life and death is.

***

The Eye of an Eagle.

The question. What is Sacred? What is sacred, is a question answered by theology, philosophy, and psychology? All require a focus on something that is outside the one who is doing the study. Theology begin with the notion that it knows; philosophy has systems of thought; and psychology concerns are among the eruptions from the unconscious.

Our question, "What is Sacred?" Sacredness cannot realize an answer outside of its sphere, which is self inquiry. Perhaps, it’s, homes, and ground rests in a certain permanent feature of our nature. Our capacity for violating our own nature is human. We can betray not only someone else but also our own selves.

If wild creatures in the forest lived that way they would make too many mistakes and not survive. They usually don’t get away with more than one or two, perhaps three mistakes and lived. We have buffered ourselves through technology against that raw relation to nature, but it has not in any way improved our relations to ourselves.

Unlike the wild creature ,the Eagle, whose eye is clear, our species has a confused eye. Our minds are dull from the illusion that we somehow are privileged to have free will. We are free for attitude, but given our attitudes, freedom stops there.Our preferences,our choices, our decisions follow upon attitude. That has the most far reaching meaning of our understanding of ourselves, and we face that upon every instant .Upon this instant our attitude will determine everything else that follow from our will, intellect, and feeling. Unfortunately, most of us live in quiet desperation denying access to the primal root of perceptional reasoning, reasoning, observation,and intuition. Have you ever wondered when you observe the Eye of an Eagle, how you were going to look at yourself in the mirror the next time? I have many times. Thus, when we possess the Eye of an Eagle, our lives are lived between the timeless and time;on that account what it is that is Sacred.

*******

01/11./2006 Leviathan prevailed.

Judge John Wade decision: People out and Profit in.

WILL LEVIATHAN PREVAIL?

Philosopher Thomas Hobbes’ point of view regarding human nature

Philosopher Thomas Hobbes’ point of view regarding human nature is is dim. Hobbes believed that existence of the human being is short lived, nasty, and brutish. The only solution is a powerful government to reign with absolute power and society must be controlled with a firm grip. The view of Thomas Hobbes is contrary to the author because Government control is Corporate Welfare and the Good in human consciousness is set aside. We have been educated to be violent. If we are born to be violent than why is there a part of one self which resist violence and, is appalled by violence? Surely, our condition to hold the animal nature captive makes for violence and Government maintain it in power through violence. Controlling Government considers Man incapable of Goodness and the author's view is that people inherently are Good and are capable of Goodness. Because the human being has the capability of "Goodness" he or she can do well with a small Government. A Government least controlling is least interested in Corporate Welfare and is interested in protecting Liberty and Property. The Political Philosophy interpreted by John Locke is a view that human beings are rational and have the ability to reason and find alternatives from violence in order to protect their Liberty and ownership of Property.  I believe Locke's interpretation is morally correct in  our society protecting our Constitutional rights.

Contrary to Hobbes, the major cause of violence, I think, is that each one of us is inwardly, psychologically, seeking security. The human being has an urge for psychological security - that inward senses of being safe - projects the demand, the outward demand, for security. Inwardly each one of us wants to be secure, sure, certain. That is why we have all these laws, in order that we maybe secure in our relationship. If that relationship is attacked we become violent, which is the psychological demand, the inward demand, to be certain of our relationship to everything. But there is no such thing as certainty, security, in any relationship. Inwardly, psychologically we should like to be secure, but there is no such thing as permanent security.
Good is the natural moral social contract between human beings. Human beings are inherently curious, self-sufficient, and social. The interpretation of short lived and nasty is considered the "violent" nature of the human being. Each one will have a different opinion and volumes have been written about it! What is essential is not to explain the causes but to see violence as it is - as a fundamental issue in human relationship. And to find out whether it should perpetuate itself, or be changed, or modified. Hobbes did not discuss the fundamental issue involved in violence. Because Hobbes failed to inquire whether it is possible to live without violence the theory of Hobbes is flawed. One must be capable of looking at violence and understanding it, then perhaps there is a possibility of resolving it totally and discern a point of view contrary to Hobbism.

The North Lake Project is a classic example of Thomas Hobbes theory. The Government is omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent. Acting as a Real Estate Broker, Developer, and Taking property by Eminent Domain the Government demonstrates that the homeowner, business owner, and church are leasing the Land until the City, or in this case the Municipal Valley water district decides to seize it. The value of our home ownership, family business, and Church is dismissed. The following tale is  the Government's power in Hobbes "Leviathan" demonstrated, fully in the North Lake Project. The characters in the tale are the City of San Bernardino, Municipal Valley Water District,  Regional Water Resources, Mayor of San Bernardino, council members, attorneys for the respondents, and I.

On 01/11/2006 , Judge Wade, will hear the cases and determine THE LIFE OF  LEVIATHAN in the Superior Court of California, SanBernardino.

Will Leviathan Prevail?

Leviathan is Thomas Hobbes political view advocating powerful Government. The name "Leviathan"or "Great Sea Monster" is derived from the Hebrew Bible or the Christian Old Testament. Since "Leviathan" is drawn from religious literature, I decided to write the meditation below in philosophical - religious theatrical form. The following is a meditation tale commenting the theory promulgated by Thomas Hobbes.

WILL LEVIATHAN PREVAIL?

In solitude, I sit and wait until Truth unveils herself and after much communing Truth appeared rising out of the Sea disguised as a Great Water Creature. Full of pride, aggrandizing, selfish, brutish and bestial the Monster possessed one large horn, and on its sides there were two smaller horns protruding, and the larger of the two having seven heads.

Surely, I was in the Spirit and as I looked up I saw a woman triumphant sitting upright galloping a Trojan Horse. The woman arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with precious stones, having in her hand a scroll and on the scroll names were engraved from souls she devoured in her war with the Saints of the North Lake. When I saw her, I marveled with great amazement as she gallop her Trojan Horse to the Great Water Creature celebrating a political feast of her victory. When she arrived, she hand the scroll to the Great Water Creature and point her finger at a white handkerchief blotted in blood. Suddenly, she looked at me as she pierced her golden spear in the creature and boastfully she said: "It's done." The Great Water Predator gloated and said: "for by your sorcery all the people were deceived."

Now, I saw more horses in the vision, and nine horsemen armored with breastplates of steel, and the head of the horses were like the heads of lions roaring having in their hands’ scales of blaspheming. Than, I saw a body of half a woman and half a serpent, who sat on a Stallion pointing a dagger at my ribs. The woman - serpent sat on her Stallion and out of her mouth leaped flames of fire and in her political power she ordered the people and I out of the village.

After many seasons, the serpent woman and all those who succeeded her Rest with the Great Sea Creature for no one in power were able to Free themselves from the power of Leviathan and those in power gave Leviathan Praise, Glory, and Honor. Consequently, all those in power sold their Glory for false psychological security and demand of an Iron Grip Society who hypnotized the Mind to remain primitive, captive, and estranged from Reality.

The people of the nearby villages, however, observed the depth of Leviathan and the reflection of the Great Sea Creature with a large horn and two small horns protruding having seven heads as a reminder how Government rules as the Great Sea Monster. Surely, the Spirit of Leviathan is the destiny of San Bernardino, a reminder for the North Lake knowing that the seven heads in power failed their Duty serving the public and violated the integrity of their office. The fruit of the North Lake longed for has gone and all who gave praise have gone, only the spirits of the Saints remain.

************************************

The Ultimate Imitator

Part one of three

Inherited Memories

For Thomas Hobbes the common peoples’ minds are like clean paper; fit to receive whatsoever by authority will be imprinted upon them. What would happen to Hobbism if the common people are educated to question and assume responsibility? Because we all have a common evolutionary history, we all share the same collectiveness, however, only a few people question the shared tendencies inherited from our ancestors. Most of us accept opposed to question repeat experiences from our ancestors. The nature of the mind, psychologically, is the existence of these historical layers of inherited memories from our ancestors, the way in which they thought and felt, and the way in which they conceived life and the world, of God(s) and human beings. Even though, the mind psychologically at birth is a tabula rasa, a blank slate, and is informed only be experience that is by sense innate ideas. These sense innate ideas are the sum of inherited memories from socialization, not retained as an unconscious memory in the collective unconscious according to Carl Jung. Thus, it cannot be denied there is a history beyond the individual manifestation, a blank slate, the inevitable inherited memories. The problem is not the inherited characteristic but accepting opposed to question these shared tendencies. A mind which merely repeats is mechanical and dependent; can never regenerate and be creative in its natural state. The Ultimate imitator is a three-part article which describes the number of characteristics which are inherited from religious socialization.

Part one and two is the explanation of what humans’ use to solve problems, symbols of saviors, death, rebirth, reincarnating, or resurrection. Part three concludes teaching of myths (religion) and cultures. The primary characteristic equally shared; however, is psychological, as evidence that they evoke inherited memories. First, there is a need for psychological security. Second, there is a need for the psyche’s interest in security instead finding out what is true.

In every religion we find story after story of a divine being who comes to each and mingles with its citizens? In the Buddhist tradition the development of Buddhism was connected with Gautama’s Bodhi-satva state. Before he was born on earth, he was believed to have last existed in a state of self enlightened knowledge as a Bodhi-satva, and to have voluntarily chosen to become a savior of the world before attaining the Nirvana to which he was entitle. Is it possible to trace Gods adored by human beings to the exaggeration a deification of heroic men?

Part two of three Hero's, Women, and Sex in Religion.

So, is it possible to grace God(s) adored by multitudes of human beings to the exaggeration and deification of heroic men. Krishna is the most popular of all the incarnations of Hinduism. A multitude of marvelous stories are told about him and it is evident from the history of Krishna literature and practices, like Rama, is a deified hero. For all men up to his time Moses, the hero of Judaism, may be regarded as the man who came into closets relation with the divine. In Islam the dawn of Mohammed’s prophetic mission led him more and more to the belief that a prophet was needed by his people, and that he might be the desired prophet. The Savior and God of Christianity, Jesus Christ, secured salvation as a condition of freedom from sin. The evidence is clear that each culture has universal symbols of Heroism. Undoubtedly, these heros are defied. Unfortunately, my imitating the hero the belief is to remain in the realm of myth, hence in reality. The image of sexual behavior is also shared by religions. Why do we find images of the ideal woman’s ever man’s sexual fantasy, beautiful, sensual, and infinitely available? This kind of image as part of man can be found in every religion.* In the Jewish folk tradition, God created Adam and Lilith at the same time, but Lilith refused to subordinate to Adam and ran away. Personally, I favor Lilith who exercised her deep humanness of sexuality and independence. The story of Eve followed Lillith and  Eve was made from the rib of the Man, a role more suitable for a Patriarch Society. Other major religions have also a problem of women’s sexuality like the image of the virgin mother of Jesus and the Buddhist Goddess of mercy. Probably the most negative views about sexuality are conveyed by Islamic imagery. The religion of Islam argues that social order depends on careful attention being paid to cast differences based on gender. Men live in the public sphere and worship in the mosque, wherein women remain the private spheres of the home where they also pray. Spiritually, women are held to be one with earth; women are assimilated to the soil and seed to the semen. Clearly, humans added an additional dimension, it is not merely human, it is also cosmic. The man has modeled himself on the transcendent human plane of cosmic spirit and the woman remains bound to earth.

The concept of religion is favorable for the man opposed to the woman. The truth is that every man and woman is born with biological energy and biological energy empowers all living functions and makes no distinctions between male and female. This biological energy is the combination of unorganized array of sensations, impulses, and possibilities. Because of our genitals, immediately after birth or in the womb society directs and limits the empowerment of biological energy that increases those sensations, impulses, and possibilities throughout our lives.

Part three of three

The inherent urge of harmonizing biological energies.

Each one of us is born with biological energy which empowers all living functions and makes no distinction between male and female. These biological energies are the sum of nature operating through us, both destructive and creative. These powerful forces of nature are destructive if ignored and unheeded, however, creative, and the source of guidance and meaning essential for development. Nature represents creation and life, earthiness, and concreteness, receptive and yielding, dark and light, cold and hot, soft and hard, stimulating and dividing, male and female, etc. Because human beings are the sums of nature, they are potentially bisexual, biologically as well as psychologically. At birth this biological energy is the combination of unorganized array of male and female sensation, impulses, potentialities, and possibilities. In other words, each human being has male and female energies and the inherent urge is harmonizing both energies simultaneously toward wholeness of individuation, the state of being what one was meant to become. This is a crucial concept of wholeness, a healthy mind, because our present socialization is destructive and inhibits potentialities to male and female simultaneously. The aim of religion should be in harmonizing these energies, however, in many religions these energies are repressed and what remained is mere body function. This body function is mechanical and serves as a fence for false security and fulfilment. As you can see, the psyche’s interest is security opposed finding out what is true. The point to be emphasized is that from the beginning, man and woman sets his and her imitation of meaning and fulfillment. The faithful repetition of an inherited memory, heros’ sexuality, and immortality still survive in the modern world today denying the fact that man and woman is today mortal and sexualized.

Morality does not offer us a coming world, which is better than the good. The idea of a bridge, or bridge, or retribution which justice is administered is the myth of immortality. The Last Day the day of standing up or separation is a theology of many religions. Judaism after the prophets viewed the body as a sort of prison for the soul, which long to rise again to God. Man’s salvation lies in the direction of the mortification of sensual impulses. With Hinduism, however, the soul, substance, unchanging, in man and which transmigrates or is reincarnated.

To conclude, an examined life is Good. Examination of myths derived from inherited memories and socialization. It is clear that within the human body including the mind, a superior organ is the sum of nature or biological energies’ ready to unfold potentialities and possibilities. Improper socialization robs potentialities and possibilities that create a life of fulfillment and meaning.

* Genesis 1:27   So God created man in His own image; in the image ofr God He created him; male and female  He created them.

Genesis 1:28 Then  God blessed them, and God said to them , "Be fruitful and multiply..........

In Genesis 1:27 God created Adam and Lilith. See Jewish folklore.

Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Genesis 2:21 And the Lord God   caused a deep sleep to fall on Adam, and he slept; and He took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh t6 its place.

Genesis 2:22 Then the rib which the LordGod has taken from man He made into a woman, and He brought her to the man.

The above references is to point out the differences between Genesis 1:27 and Genesis 2:7 & 2:21-22. Eve is the second wife of Adam and Eve was made from Adam and God brought Eve to Adam. (the LordGod brought Eve to Adam. Why did theLordGod have to bring Eve to Adam? In Genesis 1:27 God created male and female in his image and then blessed them.)

The woman's position because of Eve is subordinate and  determines the woman as a second sex. A female birth is less significant and her role is to subordinate and serve. In other words, the role of the gender is determined and destined at birth.  Lilith, on the other hand, found her place as an equal creation (Gen.1:27) and did not want to subordinate to Adam. Lilith preferred to leave Adam opposed to subordinate her position as an equal.

Should anatomy be your destiny at birth?

The story of Adam and Eve has changed the destiny for women. The anatomy of Eve is formed from Adam and her destiny is to serve. This changed the woman's status and she became a second sex opposed to Lillith status as an equal.   Eve's destiny is determined because of her anatomy and   Eve caused the roles of women depicted in religion   not favorable.  The story of Adam and Liillith would have been more favorable for women and her anatomy at birth would not make a difference because they were created equal. Personally, I find this truthful anatomy theory disturbing that a woman's destiny is determined because of her anatomy at birth  and how she has to   struggle to strive for equal rights and status in her culture.

Note: In Genesis 1:27 God created male and female in the image of God.

In Genesis 2:7 and Genesis 2: The Lord God   formed man of the dust of the ground.

Note:   In Genesis 1:27 male and female were created in his image. In Genesis 2:7 the man was formed from the dust of the ground. The differences is creation and formation, and God vs. Lord God.

***

Meditation: LUDWIG VA N BEETHOVEN

In solitude I meditate on Beethoven’s divine immortal music. How did Beethoven create such divine music, being almost near deaf? Beethoven must have been afraid and how did he free himself from the fear of not knowing and how did he create such music of immense beauty? I believe that Beethoven was his music and there was no separation of his Creativity and in his Creativity he heard his music. Beethoven’s intensity was his ear and Beethoven heard his music in his own mind, an intellect capable moving into great depths where all energies’ contact to master a particular task of creating. Once Beethoven finished a particular creation, I am sure he felt frustrated and having a sense of continuity as in relation to his isolation suffered from depression. In meditation, however, Beethoven freed his mind from any psychological and physical pain and moved his mind into the unknown creating music so beautiful that his music became immortal. The fear is the known, I am afraid of the accumulations, physical or psychological, that I have gathered as a means of warding off pain or preventing sorrow. In meditation the fear which is the known die, which comes to an end, can renew itself. Beethoven moved from the gloom of his mind’s inner landscapes to greet with joy the public world. Beethoven passion and creativity were his immense ability of intense feeling and it was the spontaneous activity of his mind and imagination that contacted all his energies to such a depth that the notes written were perfect. The deeper the water, the deeper the note a moment realized with a special beauty and intensity.

In meditation I listen to his music and I find myself experiencing nature in all its moods, to feel the wind, rain, and sun. I look at a country side carpeted with thick green grass and graced with countless trees and flowers in fitful splendor. I walk the broad meadows, rocky clefts, elm-girt woodland paths and murmuring rushing brooks.  I feel  intoxicated, exhilarated beyond measure - until a doubt begins to nag. His music is my joy and I give thanks to feel  for only a brief moment his passion, his splendor, and his God.

Thank you Ludwig van Beethoven.

* A mind in a freer state has many depths of consciousness and creative energies. Only a mind freer from his or her conditioned state is creative and intelligent.

The argument: Is it possible to stand alone? That is in relationship with your social, religious, and political community?

Is it possible to be freer from your conditioning in order to learn. You cannot learn if you remain a person of any organized religion, organized political party, or organized belief. For example, if you remain a member of a religious group or political party for the the rest of your life you are finished in finding out "what is" in reality. The Hindu remains a Hindu and the Capitalist remain a Capitalist and the Hindu and Capitalist are equally dead. But is it possible - that is really the question-- to reject all conditoning which accepts authority? Can you really reject all authority and stand alone to find out? And you must be alone. Otherwise, if you are not alone in the deeper sense of that word, you repeat what authorities has taught you.

Is it possible to be absolutely alone and face your life in relationship of being a good person -- not according to organized religion or organized politics. A Good person and a Good citizen means behavior and finding out can only be understood in relationship with another. So, by being awake in relationship is to be alert, and being watchful you shall find out and bring order in your life not invented by you or society.

Can you bring out a order that is virtue? Can you bring it out? To be virtuous there must be no battle, no conflict in you or outside. Therefore, there must be no aggressiveness, no violence, no hate, no animosity. To be awake is to be conscious

of it and to be aware of all this, aware of where you are, and from there you will move, you shall work. Than you find out you can be alone and not carry all the burdens of memory of your psychological conditioning.

******

Economic Injustice: 07/01/06

Poverty is a shortage of money and is not a trait of laziness and stupidity. If this is a true statement is not compassion a virtue in order to be fit to rule politically and set an example of Goodness?

The following is a meditation in *theatrical form to unfold the realities of two officials who ran the race as Mayor in San Bernardino, 2006.

*Theatrical form is to unfold a story based in reality and words such as chief, white feathered garments, and buffalo hide is only a dramatic interpretation of articulating the nature of the story.

The common meal is not shared by all:

In meditation, the internal life of the Chief is unveiled in my meditative mind. His mild manner and soft spoken words hypnotized the most keen and alert. The flame on his tongue convinced the people of his blue print for the village’s future. The heart of the Chief demands control and warns if the village does not plan well...the quality of life will be terribly affected. The Chief concludes that we will literally become an infestation on the landscape of Southern California

The Chief spoke to those clothed in hand made white feathered garments. Many lost souls were invited to hear his music flow from his silver tongue as he entertained melodies of rapid transit, magnificent homes, glittering lights, and flowing streams. My eyes saw this eloquent man and my spirit slipped in his gaze believing his vision and fantasies. While I was trapped in his gaze, my meditative mind observe a duality of persona and false concerns for the villagers who were left outside. I gaze in his eyes and in that moment his facade unveiled a wickedness of disgust for those clothed in garments of buffalo hide.

Than another truth unfold when I saw the elected Chief who ran his race to deliver freedom from crime on false pretense and stole the political tool from his opponent, a more righteous man who understood the disenfranchisement of the outsider. The villagers, however, believe in his well trained words, polished mannerism, and the media promote his vanity and boast his qualification as the "Great One" opposed to his opponent, a more righteous leader fit for the Common Good.

Seasons will pass and the indirect cost of our neglect suffers the injustice as violence and crime escalates. Surely, our economic system sets many up to be outsiders unable to make ends meet.

After much blood shed the peoples will demand a righteous leader who has the capability to reason and feel for those left outside. My spirit fatigued and desire to sleep I see once more the righteous man who was defeated. The forces of the Universe unite and this soul has another opportunity to conquer his honor and win his victory by leading the outsiders to the table of the common Good. Finally, my spirit sleeps and the Universe reveales this man understands the true heart of the problem and the realities that a large segment of our society is disenfranchised from our economic system, and that it is this outside status that leads to many of the village’s problems. Only when the people take back their village justice will re-appear and lessen the burden and narrow the financial gap between those clothed in white feathered garments and buffalo hide.

Joyful meditations by Deanna.

The art of Enlightenment requires your effort to be your own teacher questioning social, political, and religious boundaries which control your psychological condition. This is the only true value of a human being which can be found in attaining liberation from the Self.

If we only permit Nature to unfold herself we can attain true happines and lessen our conflict with others. It is the interference of Nature that creates disturbance of the mind.

Surely, if we recognize we are a creation of the Cosmos all the Gods invented by Man will celebrate their last Dance.

Surely, if we recognize we are created from a Star and the Cosmos is our natural habitat the Collective Conscousness of Man will have matured. Only than the human race is fit to live on this Earth and has earned redemption to plea for a second chance.

The genesis of wisdom is great doubt, great faith, and great perseverance. The mind at times is like a raging waterfall opposed to a fine silvery stream. Only in preserverance you can follow the stream and having faith in its course it will go its own way meandering here, trickling there. You must be soft in practice because the stream will find it own way, it will find the grooves, the cracks, and take you to your destination.

A philosophical insight..

The ground of all Existence:

At the depths of the ground of all existence there exist an immense background of Energy. The energy of this ground is one whole and unbroken movement and it connects everything with everything else, including the entire universe with all its fields and particles.

There is an possible evolution for maturity in consciousness because dimensions of reality are already implicit in its structure." Like a seed being "informed" to produce a living plant. The same can be said of all living matter because life is enfolded in the totality and even when it is not manifest, it is somehow implicit. It is in this argument that possibilities of higher development in consciousness of Personhood may occur because consciousness is being "informed" to manifest through "insight" which is pure perception.

The author find that before consciousness there is information and it is this information that enters into consciousness. Since this "information" is inherited biologically it is therefore evident that every human being can develop a higher level of Personhood. Also, this information is an inwardness that enters into consciousness and may be likened to an "an insight" which could, if refined, be used as an instrument for letting the "energies" of the Cosmos come through as an "active intelligence".

The human being knows he exist because he thinks, however, his thought is basically mechanical in its operation. The greatest human achievement is thought and no one can share that achievement except the homo sapien. The human, however, can further develop a sense of awareness that his thought eventhough is his greatest achievement is also his greatest hindrance in developing higher levels of personhood.

What makes the mechanical thought process relevant is intelligence. The perception of whether or not any particular thoughts are relevant or fitting requires the operation of an Energy that is not mechanical, an Energy that I shall call Intelligence. For example, you may be working on a puzzling problem for a long time. Suddently, in a flash of understanding one may see the irrelevance of one's whole way of thinking about the problem along with a different approach - such a flash is essentially an act of perception.

If than Intelligence is an "UNCONDITIONED ACT OF PERCEPTION" than the intelligence cannot be grounded in structures such as cells, molecules, atoms, and elementary particles.

The operation of Intelligence has to be beyond any factors that can included in any knowable law. The "ground of intelligence" must be in the undertermined and unknown flux, that is also the ground of all definable forms of matter. For the author, supreme or active intelligence always been at the very core which is the Ground of all Existence.

The consciousness of mankind in one and not divisible. Each person has a responsibility to achieve this and nothing else. Only through collective consciousness can man achieve this high degree of energy to reach the whole of the consciousness of mankind. Truly, there is no other way out and this is what has to be done because nothing else can work. The individual is part of the whole and can go beyond it.

A meditation of the hidden realm - empty space.

Fullness of empty space is not some giant vacuum through which matter moves. Space is every bit as real as the matter that moves through it. Space and matter are intimately connected. Indeed calculation of the quantity known as the zero-point energy suggest is that a single cubic centrimetre of empty space contains more energy than all the matter in the known Universe. Space which has so much energy; is full rather than empty. This enormous energy inherent in "empty space" can be viewed as theoretical evidence for the existence of a vast hidden realm. Only, when we use our inner energy to resolve our condition we tab the "enormous energy inherent" to move from one's narrow and particular interest toward the general and ultimately moving still deeper into that purity of compassion, love, intelligence that originate in the ground beyond thought, beyond time, and beyond emptiness.

'Original hippie' still holding on to her ideals

Debbie Pfeiffer Trunnell, Staff Writer

Article Launched: 08/20/2007 12:00:00 AM PDT

This summer marks the 40th anniversary of the Summer of Love in 1967 in San Francisco. This is the seventh in a series of profiles on San Bernardino-area folks who were there.

"In tattered tuxedos, they faced the new heroes and crawled about in confusion.

And they sheepishly grinned for their memories were dim of the decades of dark execution.

Hollow hands were raised; they stood there amazed in the shattering of their illusions.

As the windows were smashed by the ringing of revolution."

- From "Ringing of Revolution," by Phil Ochs

SAN BERNARDINO - The doors at the historic white-and-blue Victory Chapel on North F Street are open from morning until dusk to those seeking a moment of peace away from the city's troubled streets.

It is chapel owner Deanna Adams' way of reaching out and connecting with people.

She has done so since she was a 16-year-old hippie questioning authority on the streets of San Francisco.

"I am an original hippie. Someone who was rebelling against the whole `Father Knows Best' and `Donna Reed Show' lifestyle - that 1950s conservatism - even before the Summer of Love," said Adams, 60, as she sat in the whitewashed, flower-filled sanctuary of the chapel.

NO ROAMING PUSSYCATS IN DOWNTOWN, PLEASE.
The proposal by Mr. Overturf for a downtown Pussycat Theater luring Purring Pussycats Peddling Fur doesn't offer entertainment for the family. We want family entertainment. San Bernardino is blessed to have Regal manage the theatre. The expansion of the freeway makes this endeavor successful. The proposal of restaurants is a win. Seniors who grace the downtown can walk to the venue. And people who...... work can enjoy a lunch. Moreover; Route 66 can benefit. Imagine, one-half million visitors having a meal or two. Citizens of San Bernardino are thankful to have a movie theatre and as a bonus, restaurants. On a warm note, if a people flock to the California Theatre and pay premium price for live entertainment, they'll catch a movie at an affordable price. Either way, both are walking distance from downtown famous historic Route 66.

WHOEVER OPERATES FROM THE EGO IS UNFIT TO RULE.
Listening carefully to the Republican debates Mr. Cain is least qualified. The presidential hopeful has little knowledge of foreign policy and global conflict management. He stumbled when he was asked about Libya and fumbled with the Iranian nuclear issue.
The Republican Party would benefit to endorse Mr. Huntsman or Mr. Paul. America needs a civilized person who has a good perception in economic...s, foreign policy, and social issues. Mr.Huntsman has international experience with China. And Mr. Paul is astute in the US Constitution and the Federal Reserve.
The Iranian issue was addressed well by Ron Paul. Smart politics is to work with Iran diplomatically not to sanction nor a threat to attack imagined sites. Furthermore, our relationship with Israel should ease and recognition of a Palestine state priority. Moreover; a dose of fairness for the twenty-first century having excellent skill in word opposed to drawing the sword. Sanctions, threats, and intimidation are outdated strategies that stagnate progress. And wars initiated by America after the second world wars were illegal and immoral. Ron Paul voiced courageously the illegality and our international military presence as interference.
Republican presidential candidates Huntsman and Paul are men who possess a good character. My view on water-boarding and torture are similar to the candidates. Water-boarding is a barbarous trait and demeaning for America. We should employ civilized tactics to extract information. Our torture policy has sabotaged the symbol of Lady Liberty in the world. Any candidate who endorses water-boarding is unfit to represent the American people and world.
Managing global conflict and diplomacy are crucial to the twenty-first century. Rick Perry, Michelle Bachman is least favorable because of their extreme religious views Mr. Cain, Mr. Perry, and Mrs. Bachman views are contrary to morality in a democratic society. Morality is independent of organized religion. The trio has little knowledge about managing global conflict, diplomacy, and possess tunnel like perception.
Newt Gingrich is the level headed. However, his association with Freddie Mac raises a red flag to look at him more closely. New York Times supports the proposal of Mr. Huntsman pertaining to job creation. For me, character is foremost and a candidate who has the guts to humanize foreign policy and reform the United Nations having nations voice in the decision-making process mitigating the power of the big five and abolishing their veto power. In the twenty-first century power-grabbing must be replaced with fairness and goodness. And at the end my candidate who profiles honesty and integrity is Ron Paul.

AN EVENING WITH BEETHOVEN
Tomorrow, my spirit will exalt as Beethoven's music flows from the soloist fingers striking ivory rippling like murmuring rushing brooks. And a joy, a passion not found in a thousand books. Only a few can move my intellect into depth where beauty glimpses into perfection to greet my imagination into a sacred reflection.

Loud speaker is modern technology and not used by Prophet Mohammad.

The Muslim faith requires prayer five times per day facing Mecca. A prayer-call is sung as a reminder for the faithful and announced on loud speakers. Muslims have the right to exercise prayer but why use a public announcement system? The ordinance proposed by Jaffa ( Israel) is to cease the loud speaker because the loudness is noise pollution. I would be totally annoyed by a call blasting on loud-speakers five times per day, especially in the morning. The ordinance offers religious freedom and welcomes prayer-calls but without speakers. After-all speakers are a modern thing. And for those pious a reminder to drop and pray is not essential. Religious tolerance is respecting not annoying other religions, especially in a multi-faceted-religious country. Muslims feel discriminated. However; this it is a matter of noise, a prayer-call that has no meaning to the Christian and Jew. The prayer-call is appropriate but like in the days of Mohammad free from mico-phone vibrating loudly throughout air- space commonly shared. I am sure Prophet Mohammed (may he rest in peace) would approve a resolution of a natural prayer-call and pass the proposed ordinance,

Violence is deterministic; however, humans have the mind to engage in free will.
A MEDITATION ON A SUNDAY-AFTERNOON
The animal is violent, and human beings, who are the results of the animal are pre-disposed of that characteristic viewed as deterministic. Because humans evolved from the animal, it has a peculiar flair and love for wars and conflict. This is certainly shown by thousands of wars a...nd as consequence humans developed an ideology of non-violence. The ideal of non-violence is also deterministic and wired in the brain. Since humans are the result of the animal, and violence is wired in the brain is it possible to be free from violence? I question if the brain is capable observing violence not as an ideal or ideology but fact? To look into violence the mind needs energy and freedom for the action of the insight or free will to approach. This requires deep meditation seeing the fact of violence, and not only outside of you but also inside of you. The fact is that you are violent, and it cannot be eradicated by any ideology through which you think can get rid of violence. The brain is so conditioned and pre-wired to violence and the ideology about violence, and the ideology to be free oneself of violence. The flash of insight is free will in action that negates time and rids the violence not having to preach non-violence or go on showing violence. So, if one is capable of looking at violence and understanding it, then perhaps there is a possibility of resolving it totally. And that is free will in action, an un-deterministic characteristic not embodied by any other animal except the human-being.

The comment by Mr. Perez is very interesting that when you live in a dump your part of the trash. I find that a deterministic point of view and question if people have the free will to look at things differently. Mr. Perez believes that a person has the pre-deposition to become part of the trash when living in a dump. However, the mind also has the pre-deposition to employ free-will, which is the ...action of the insight, to question and examine the environment and words relating to dumping and trash. Perhaps, we can look at the environment, dumping, trash, and comment differently. For example:
"When you live in a dump, you have the opportunity to find treasure ad mist the trash." "Some polished politicians who live in up-scale neighborhoods possess a trashy character that twists and turns like the famous crooked street in San Francisco."
Secondly, Mr. Perez depicted San Bernardino as dumpy and trashy. Cities surrounding San Bernardino are not immune from violence. And broadening the scope the United States has the highest prison population in comparison to other countries. Since, this is the case San Bernardino cannot be singled out. The nature of violence is an approved contract composed of political, social, and economic inequities. Since violence is a national issue, San Bernardino like most cities is a mixture of the good, bad, and ugly. However; a healthy mind regardless of the environment is always empowered to improve instead of succumbing to weakness having no hope for tomorrow.

The editorial fails to look at the big picture of Ron Paul and his politics.
The Republican Party would benefit to endorse Mr. Paul. America needs a civilized person who has good perception in economics, foreign policy, and social issues. Mr. Paul is astute in the US Constitution and the Federal Reserve. The Iranian issue was addressed well by Ron Paul. Smart politics is to work with Iran diplomat...ically not to sanction nor a threat to attack imagined sites. Furthermore, our relationship with Israel should ease and recognition of a Palestine state priority. Moreover; a dose of fairness for the twenty-first century having excellent skill in word opposed to drawing the sword. Sanctions, threats, and intimidation are outdated strategies that stagnate progress. And wars initiated by America after the second world wars were illegal and immoral. Ron Paul voiced courageously the illegality and our international... military presence as interference. Republican presidential candidate-hopeful, Ron Paul has keen insight and good character. My view on water-boarding and torture are similar to Mr. Paul. Water-boarding is a barbarous trait and demeaning for America. We should employ civilized tactics to extract information. Our torture policy has sabotaged the symbol of Lady Liberty in the world. Any candidate who endorses water-boarding is unfit to represent the American people and world.
Managing global conflict and diplomacy are crucial to the twenty-first century. Rick Perry, Michelle Bachman is least favorable because of their extreme religious views Mr. Perry, and Mrs. Bachman views are to the contrary pertaining to morality in a democratic society. Morality is independent of organized religion. The trio has little knowledge about managing global conflict, diplomacy, and possess tunnel like perception. Newt Gingrich is the level headed. However, his association with Freddie Mac raises a red flag to look at him more closely. For me, character is foremost and a candidate who has the guts to humanize foreign policy and reform the United Nations having nations voice in the decision-making process mitigating the power of the big five and abolishing their veto power. In the twenty-first century power-grabbing must be replaced with fairness and goodness. And at the end my candidate who profiles honesty, and integrity is Ron Paul.

Meditation is bathing in perfume sprinkling fragrance splashing scent sanctifying the brain.
MEDITATION AND FREEDOM OF THE WILL
Adding to Socrates's famous words of life and examination is that the measure of free will is self-knowledge. Surely, meditation is the ointment that keeps the brain vibrant regardless of age. Bathe in meditation and watch yourself, know yourself, be yourself and take t...he responsibility for yourself. In other words: Without meditation there can be no freedom of will. For those who understand the view of determinism is for old dogs not able to learn new tricks. Our gift from the Universe is the ability to explore into our consciousness. Our mind has the capacity to expand to the outer-limits of the Universe and practice the craft of free-will by reflecting and allowing fantasies to play.

Violence is deterministic; however, humans have the mind to engage in free will.
A MEDITATION ON A SUNDAY-AFTERNOON
The animal is violent, and human beings, who are the results of the animal are pre-disposed of that characteristic viewed as deterministic. Because humans evolved from the animal, it has a peculiar flair and love for wars and conflict. This is certainly shown by thousands of wars a...nd as consequence humans developed an ideology of non-violence. The ideal of non-violence is also deterministic and wired in the brain. Since humans are the result of the animal, and violence is wired in the brain is it possible to be free from violence? I question if the brain is capable observing violence not as an ideal or ideology but fact? To look into violence the mind needs energy and freedom for the action of the insight or free will to approach. This requires deep meditation seeing the fact of violence, and not only outside of you but also inside of you. The fact is that you are violent, and it cannot be eradicated by any ideology through which you think can get rid of violence. The brain is so conditioned and pre-wired to violence and the ideology about violence, and the ideology to be free oneself of violence. The flash of insight is free will in action that negates time and rids the violence not having to preach non-violence or go on showing violence. So, if one is capable of looking at violence and understanding it, then perhaps there is a possibility of resolving it totally. And that is free will in action, an un-deterministic characteristic not embodied by any other animal except the human-being.

Meditation
The inner-circle of the man with the Meinkempf look soon meet its fate with a bend. After his thin tall body is wrapped in white the people shout the win on the road of Damascus. A harvest planted plenty with protest, and persistence will sprout new blades of dreams and inspirations.

Loud speaker is modern technology and not used by Prophet Mohammad.

Meditation
The inner-circle of the man with the Meinkempf look soon meet its fate with a bend. After his thin tall body is wrapped in white the people shout the win on the road of Damascus. A harvest planted plenty with protest, and persistence will sprout new blades of dreams and inspirations.

MeditationThe inner-circle of the man with the Meinkempf look soon meet its fate with a bend. After his thin tall body is wrapped in white the people shout the win on the road of Damascus. A harvest planted plenty with protest, and persistence will sprout new blades of dreams and inspirations.

Loud speaker is modern technology and not used by Prophet Mohammad.

MeditationThe inner-circle of the man with the Meinkempf look soon meet its fate with a bend. After his thin tall body is wrapped in white the people shout the win on the road of Damascus. A harvest planted plenty with protest, and persistence will sprout new blades of dreams and inspirations.

Meditation
The inner-circle of the man with the Meinkempf look soon meet its fate with a bend. After his thin tall body is wrapped in white the people shout the win on the road of Damascus. A harvest planted plenty with protest, and persistence will sprout new blades of dreams and inspirations.

Meditation
The inner-circle of the man with the Meinkempf look soon meet its fate with a bend. After his thin tall body is wrapped in white the people shout the win on the road of Damascus. A harvest planted plenty with protest, and persistence will sprout new blades of dreams and inspirations.