Corporate Welfare=Eminent Domain & Redevelopment. Animal Justice. Meditations, Poetry, Short Stories
What you must know about the North Lake project.
Home
Should Gov.Compete with Citizens? Socialism Stupefies the Brain.County Miscalculates Greed.
Summary of the appellate court 08/20/07: citizens and water.
Sicko: Profiteering Medical Care, Public Policy, Outsourcing, Selling Sickness, Dr.Prem Reddy.
Media and your Mind, Report Card, Friendly or Hostile States. Other ED abuse projects.
09/01/06 Rebuttals, Vote No on Measure Z and YY 11/07/06
June 27, 1965 "Blight Eats at the Heart of SB. Repeat of Land Grab & Blight as a Political Tool.
08/27/06Filmmaker in S.B. S.B. part of Documentary. Flooding S.B. Filmmaker needs you.
APRIL 28,1964 SB Water Crisis, Dictorial powers, Water Truth Committee & Harold Willis.
Argue:Philo, Bio-Psych, Bio-Evolu, Historical ,Political, Media , State of Nature:Good,Bad,andEvil.
The Constitution. What does the Constitution Mean to You?
The Bill of Rights. What does the Bill of Rights Mean to You?
The Declaration of Independence. What does the Declaration of Independence Mean to You?
The Unknown Government. RDA. The Redevelopment Agency.
Quick facts of Eminent Domain.
Develop don't Destroy.
Latest News, Muni, Letters
City of San Bdno Planning Commission meeting 03/08/05
Contamination or Extermination? Is High waterground Mitigation a myth or reality?
Psychological Revolution
Purpose: Change Perception and Develop a Mature Consciousness.
Hands off my Home, Ministry, and Chapel.
The True Nature of the North Lake project.
Let Freedom Ring in your Castle.
The Cultural & Historic Significance of the Stephens & Bobbitt Funeral Home..
Central City Mall project aka Carousal Mall
Seccombe Lake Project.
How can 72 unaffordable homes replace 437 affordable housing units?
Reality of the Reservoir
Blight is bogus and the fallibleness of the expert.
What Muni does not want you to know.
Environmental Injustice
Unrealized benefits and an inaccurate overriding consideration.
What you must know about the North Lake project.
How to stop the injustice
Initiatives, education, and law suits
Sounding off and Links
Historic Homes, Flawed FEIR, Victory Chapel, Stephens & Bobbitt.
Paul's opinion, supporters opinion, author's rebuttal, and staged rally.
Joint public hearing 04/25/05 speech by Josie Gonzales and author's rebuttal.
Joint Public Hearing 04/25/05 speech by Rabbi Hillel Cohen and author's rebuttal.
Weil Alatar, Superintendent Arturo Delgado, a School Bus, and author's rebuttal.
Philosophical notes and meditations.
Philosophical notes, animal justice, short stories, meditations, poetry.
political meditations, philosophical notes, poetry, short stories.

funnypics004.jpg

 

 

 What you need to know about the project:

"May the character of your elected officials who certified the Final Environmental Impact Report reflect the outcome of their vote in using their power entrusted by the people. May this give you the insight to remove the mask tailored by their hands and glean into their spotted soul". Deanna

The authors of the Final Environmental Impact Report point out  all feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to lessen project impacts to a less than significant level where feasible and furthermore,  all alternatives of the project are either infeasible, because they have greater environmental impacts, or otherwise socially or economically infeasible. The following facts are correct pertaining to the North Lake project:

1. The only goal this project has is to erase an entire community to limit blight and attack the heart of progress in San Bernardino. The project as approved by the City and Muni is flawed. In it's present form it is nothing more than a suburban style lake accompanied with a plan to plunk down three commercial pads and 72 isolated homes in the middle of distressed neighborhoods. The Environmental impact report does not report why the alternatives was laid aside. It only tells us all the properties need to go for the sake of development and reducing blight.

2. There is a fatal fiscal flaw which puts the City of San Bernardino in a very vulnerable situation. This is because the Municipal Water District alone will be acquiring the 82.4 acre site.

3. The City of San Bernardino approved a plan for the Municipal Water District, a public entity, to use 44 1/2 acre site for a reservoir and the 25 acres of excess land on the premise that it is needed for construction activities.

4. The City of San Bernardino authorized the Municipal Valley Water District to hold the title to 25 acres of land. The 25 acres owned by the Municipal Valley Water District is held for redevelopment purposes until some date in time when the City of San Bernardino comes up with a huge source of funding to compensate the Municipal Valley Water District.

5. The Final Environmental Impact Report merely states, quote, "certain remnant lands may be transferred to the Redevelopment for reuse as redevelopment". The Environmental Injustice is in fact that there is no guarantee that there will be any redevelopment in those 25 acres. Further, the financial analysis that was completed for the joint powers authority clearly states, quote, "cleared residential land would need to be offered to a developer at or below market value with backbone infra-structure and utilities". The project would require substantial public tax increase in order to achieve desired development because the cost of delivering the developable land to private developers will substantially exceed the potential resale market and the value of the land.

6. The redevelopment activities in San Bernardino are financed by the Community Development Commission based on the project's ability to generate an equal or greater amount of future revenues. The Final Environmental Impact Report failed to point out  the proposed redevelopment project is not capable of generating adequate revenues in future years that would justify a massive investment of public redevelopment funds.

7. The Final Environmental Impact Report failed to address  the 72 upscale single family homes and 12 acres of commercial development space proposed in the North Lake project would be grossly incapable of generating future revenues from either tax increment or sales tax to repay the massive public subsidy of redevelopment funds in a reasonable period of time to sustain on going redevelopment elsewhere in the City.

8. The Final Environmental Impact Report desire is to limit blight; however, the issue of Blight exceeds to other neighborhoods who becomes the recipient of affordable multi-family units since many neighborhoods are adamantly opposed to construction of new low-income apartments.

9. The Final Enviromental Impact Report failed to address the replacement cost of affordable units since the 72 upscale homes in the North Lake project will not be affordable units. Municipal Valley Water District will purchase all the properties, but who will fund the 437 affordable units that is required by law to replace?

10. The City of San Bernardino repeatedly oppose the construction of low income housing projects.